But you sure see a lot of pictures from certain parts of the world in which people take to the streets, giving up all personal space, to form such a tight mob that if you died on the spot you could not fall down.
If these people are not nuts, they do marvelous impersonations of lunatics, and so do their official, and unofficial leaders.
Here we see a man putting on his best lunatic impression while his armpit valet carries on with his duties.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
You Can't Handle The Truth!
The old line from a Nicholson movie. Actually, I can't handle the truth. My truth scares me, when I let it.
So, I rarely write about real life in my fog filled bubble. It all seems so simple on paper---do this, do that, fix this fix that, get rid of all that clutter, this clutter, and clean up after it. Find woman, drag to cave, make happy.
Every once in awhile, maybe three times per day, I see something or think of something and say, "Oh man, you really blew it. You squandered one perfectly good life."
My goal is to change that before I die. I think I want to fix it before it is all gone.
I think people are crazy in groups, and fear freedom and all that, but then I wonder if I am wrong, considering how difficult I find the simplest of normal life tasks. Is it possible that I am crazy and they are right? Or maybe I am right, and crazy. I believe the latter to be the most accurate assessment.
It is the holiday season, and I guess this time of year brings out the remembered pain of numerous heartbreaks, the horror of bad judgement and irresponsible actions of the past, and fear when I realize how empty a certain part of me is.
Where to go from that is not actually a mystery, but doing it appears to involve taking down a 4 foot thick concrete wall with a ball peen hammer.
In the mean time, I have to go by the house of some friends on Christmas. Then I think I'll disappear for a few days to a campsite on the edge of the earth.
None of this should be a surprise. I knew I had serious disconnect and lack of cultural understanding way back when people first started playing air guitar. When they actually began staging public contests for this bizarre sport, I realized I may forever be lost in this world. Then came disco, karoke on Beale St in Memphis (dubious blues capital of the Delta), and reality TV. Clearly my best path is not one which involves understanding, promoting or keeping abreast of pop culture and its many mysterious twists and turns.
If I can't figure that stuff out, how can I be surprised at all the other crazy stuff? Let's all hope to win powerball so we can be filthy rich, but let's carry on a cultural campaign so that the words "rich" and "evil" become synonymous in the minds of the people. I want to win lotto and be rich, but for now I hate THE RICH because they are all meanies.
First we had that Bridge to the New Millennium to cross, now we are all going to be cast over THE FISCAL CLIFF. I've yet to even see the bridge, which means I may not have made it across into the glorious 21st century. Perhaps being tossed over The Cliff would be the kindest thing.
.
So, I rarely write about real life in my fog filled bubble. It all seems so simple on paper---do this, do that, fix this fix that, get rid of all that clutter, this clutter, and clean up after it. Find woman, drag to cave, make happy.
Every once in awhile, maybe three times per day, I see something or think of something and say, "Oh man, you really blew it. You squandered one perfectly good life."
My goal is to change that before I die. I think I want to fix it before it is all gone.
I think people are crazy in groups, and fear freedom and all that, but then I wonder if I am wrong, considering how difficult I find the simplest of normal life tasks. Is it possible that I am crazy and they are right? Or maybe I am right, and crazy. I believe the latter to be the most accurate assessment.
It is the holiday season, and I guess this time of year brings out the remembered pain of numerous heartbreaks, the horror of bad judgement and irresponsible actions of the past, and fear when I realize how empty a certain part of me is.
Where to go from that is not actually a mystery, but doing it appears to involve taking down a 4 foot thick concrete wall with a ball peen hammer.
In the mean time, I have to go by the house of some friends on Christmas. Then I think I'll disappear for a few days to a campsite on the edge of the earth.
None of this should be a surprise. I knew I had serious disconnect and lack of cultural understanding way back when people first started playing air guitar. When they actually began staging public contests for this bizarre sport, I realized I may forever be lost in this world. Then came disco, karoke on Beale St in Memphis (dubious blues capital of the Delta), and reality TV. Clearly my best path is not one which involves understanding, promoting or keeping abreast of pop culture and its many mysterious twists and turns.
If I can't figure that stuff out, how can I be surprised at all the other crazy stuff? Let's all hope to win powerball so we can be filthy rich, but let's carry on a cultural campaign so that the words "rich" and "evil" become synonymous in the minds of the people. I want to win lotto and be rich, but for now I hate THE RICH because they are all meanies.
First we had that Bridge to the New Millennium to cross, now we are all going to be cast over THE FISCAL CLIFF. I've yet to even see the bridge, which means I may not have made it across into the glorious 21st century. Perhaps being tossed over The Cliff would be the kindest thing.
.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Foreign News
What is the deal with news departments hiring Brits and others who aren't American and don't really understand the place? It's worse in CA I think. Any accent other than one common to this country is seen as intellectually superior.
The people may be bright, educated and hard working, but in cases like Piers Morgan, they haven't a clue why we are not England, or anything remotely related to philosophy of freedom.
Maybe CNN thinks Americans can't report news with such a blatant disregard for fact checking and critical thinking. So they hire smarmy foreigners who don't know the difference between liberty and tyranny, or fact and fiction.
I'm stunned that people get paid to be such dimwits. Go back to England, Piers, and tell them your theories on what our Constitution means. People like that are why we are here. First their pompous heavy handedness contributed to it, and then their arrogance at underestimating their foe. Qualities which Piers proudly wears wherever he speaks.
=================
Here's a little added statistic for the gun argument.
Those who encounter other humans and who carry a loaded weapon are 100% more likely to shoot some one or get shot than those who never encounter other humans and never carry a gun.
The people may be bright, educated and hard working, but in cases like Piers Morgan, they haven't a clue why we are not England, or anything remotely related to philosophy of freedom.
Maybe CNN thinks Americans can't report news with such a blatant disregard for fact checking and critical thinking. So they hire smarmy foreigners who don't know the difference between liberty and tyranny, or fact and fiction.
I'm stunned that people get paid to be such dimwits. Go back to England, Piers, and tell them your theories on what our Constitution means. People like that are why we are here. First their pompous heavy handedness contributed to it, and then their arrogance at underestimating their foe. Qualities which Piers proudly wears wherever he speaks.
=================
Here's a little added statistic for the gun argument.
Those who encounter other humans and who carry a loaded weapon are 100% more likely to shoot some one or get shot than those who never encounter other humans and never carry a gun.
Monday, December 3, 2012
O Holy Smoke
Dear God inem,
Why is it that if we have to have a world with countries that are theocracies, they can't be Quakers, or some happy fertility rite focussed cloister? Or both, like one owns Iraq and one owns Iran.
Look, many of us get the joke. We got it a long time ago. So, how bout changing the skit to something a little less hardcore slapstick? One big massive global brainwave treatment to reset minds might help. Then again, maybe not.
Thank you.
I prefer to remain anonymous if you don't mind, so I won't tell you who I am.
Why is it that if we have to have a world with countries that are theocracies, they can't be Quakers, or some happy fertility rite focussed cloister? Or both, like one owns Iraq and one owns Iran.
Look, many of us get the joke. We got it a long time ago. So, how bout changing the skit to something a little less hardcore slapstick? One big massive global brainwave treatment to reset minds might help. Then again, maybe not.
Thank you.
I prefer to remain anonymous if you don't mind, so I won't tell you who I am.
Buy or Die
Buy or die, you lowly mofo.
I'm with/usurping your federal government, and I'm here to help you!
Of course, if you would just fill out the proper forms, and forever remain under our scrutiny, proving your state of income, etc., we might just give you free care, access to which would also be subject to approval and our assessment of your needs weighed against society's priorities, as we decree them, on a case by case basis. See? You can't lose, my filthy little peon of a citizen child.
Now, join the other 50% and thank me.
Better yet join the 30% who pray to me at night and know that I am holy.
.
Guns and Lunatics
As usual, another allegedly famous person, of whom I had no knowledge, is involved in a gun debacle, and our oh so wise, learned TV celebrities decry our freedom to own firearms. If only whatsisname had not had access to firearms he and his victim would be alive and happy today.
The thought is that more regulation would make it all better. If we restrict gun usage to only government agents and military, then we'll be OK. We've done what we can to disarm the military on their own bases, and that worked out very well in helping the guy who ignored the rules to slaughter people on a military base.
The arguments tend to ignore the reasons that people like me would consider having some firepower handy. When a thug is threatening, admonitions of "don't take the law into your own hands" offer little in the way of immediate conflict resolution. Wait a minute, my good man, let's call 911 and see if we can settle this matter.
It is a shame that anyone needs or uses firearms to influence or stop the actions of people. They are an effective tool in the process of self defense when one is outnumbered or out muscled, or when an intruder or assailant is armed. The fact that there are so many people who believe in taking what is not theirs -property or life-by force will not change by disarming the harmless.
Although it is like having a pea shooter against a tank, I like knowing people can be armed simply because I think the biggest threat to property and life is the institution which has the most firepower--government. Tyranny functions best when the people are rendered impotent.
It has nothing to do with hunting, or any of that. It has to do with last line of defense in trying to maintain control of one's own life and destiny. It is hard to enslave an armed group of people.
Thugs and cops present the biggest danger to one's freedom, if they are not somehow contained. Usually one needn't be prepared to resist cops, but sometimes things get out of hand. A government which fears the people because they have means to revolt, should they see the need, is better than a government which has no such fears. It is one weak link in the system of checks to the power of the state.
That is why the foolish sheep, and the savvy purveyors of the religion of governmental solutions to problems both real and imagined, are all for disarming those who abide by the law. The more we can't protect ourselves from the cultural results of decades of failed policies which helped facilitate the network of sociopathic criminal gangs and other aberrant forms of life, the worse off we are.
The cases in which senseless violence is in play are often the results of cultural decay, and The Big Pretense. To think certain kinds of movies and video games have no influence on behavior is a bit naive. That is not to say those things are totally to blame. They are more a symptom.
We glorify mass murder in games and movies and even in the news, then wonder why depressed, confused kids who lack social skills and popularity decide to make a name for themselves in some tragic manner. Lunatic shooters, even if thwarted get more press than people who make breakthroughs in research and invention. It is sad.
But then, if you see a wonderful, work of art, movie, the fame and credit goes to the major actors, and rarely do you have a clue who actually created and wrote the piece. That is kind of an interesting thing. It is remarkable how good actors and directors can bring a story to life, but the one who created the story and laid out the blueprint for the film is not of interest.
It takes little thought, and seems to be a case of jumping on the band wagon, when pundits reflexively assail gun ownership and the right to carry as if that is the root of the problem. They sound like a broken record. I accused the main news media of being the government's sales force many decades ago, and it has only become moreso over time. They always seem to think that authoritarian rule is the answer.
When I saw that Costas had to do a little editorial during a football game, and heard the content of his message, I couldn't help but believe he was idiotically parroting the talking points of the usual neo-bolsheviks in order to gain cool guy points with the other useful idiots in the entertainment world. Surely he didn't really try to think this out.
It amazes me how easily people will jump on peer pressure causes if they think it will cast their image as cool and intellectual. Especially without the effort of really considering all the factors involved. This is why people can be led into some form of slave state cheering and with their consent.
Oh well. This is why decent and smart people should be breeding as fast as they can--the problem is cultural and the more good people that are put into the mix, the more likely it is that the culture will veer away from the Big Pretense and stepping on the sanctity and rights of the individual.
I suppose seeing the story of how Worcester, Mass. has been buying guns from people by offering a free flu shot and a grocery store gift card put me over the top on this. Turn in your weapons and we'll toss you a little treat! If I wanted my money to go toward buying guns, I'd buy them myself, not vote my tax money go toward that. Or your money. Maybe all the peace officers in that town are saints, and the thugs all lined up to trade weapons for vaccinations and food. Somehow I doubt it.
.
.
The thought is that more regulation would make it all better. If we restrict gun usage to only government agents and military, then we'll be OK. We've done what we can to disarm the military on their own bases, and that worked out very well in helping the guy who ignored the rules to slaughter people on a military base.
The arguments tend to ignore the reasons that people like me would consider having some firepower handy. When a thug is threatening, admonitions of "don't take the law into your own hands" offer little in the way of immediate conflict resolution. Wait a minute, my good man, let's call 911 and see if we can settle this matter.
It is a shame that anyone needs or uses firearms to influence or stop the actions of people. They are an effective tool in the process of self defense when one is outnumbered or out muscled, or when an intruder or assailant is armed. The fact that there are so many people who believe in taking what is not theirs -property or life-by force will not change by disarming the harmless.
Although it is like having a pea shooter against a tank, I like knowing people can be armed simply because I think the biggest threat to property and life is the institution which has the most firepower--government. Tyranny functions best when the people are rendered impotent.
It has nothing to do with hunting, or any of that. It has to do with last line of defense in trying to maintain control of one's own life and destiny. It is hard to enslave an armed group of people.
Thugs and cops present the biggest danger to one's freedom, if they are not somehow contained. Usually one needn't be prepared to resist cops, but sometimes things get out of hand. A government which fears the people because they have means to revolt, should they see the need, is better than a government which has no such fears. It is one weak link in the system of checks to the power of the state.
That is why the foolish sheep, and the savvy purveyors of the religion of governmental solutions to problems both real and imagined, are all for disarming those who abide by the law. The more we can't protect ourselves from the cultural results of decades of failed policies which helped facilitate the network of sociopathic criminal gangs and other aberrant forms of life, the worse off we are.
The cases in which senseless violence is in play are often the results of cultural decay, and The Big Pretense. To think certain kinds of movies and video games have no influence on behavior is a bit naive. That is not to say those things are totally to blame. They are more a symptom.
We glorify mass murder in games and movies and even in the news, then wonder why depressed, confused kids who lack social skills and popularity decide to make a name for themselves in some tragic manner. Lunatic shooters, even if thwarted get more press than people who make breakthroughs in research and invention. It is sad.
But then, if you see a wonderful, work of art, movie, the fame and credit goes to the major actors, and rarely do you have a clue who actually created and wrote the piece. That is kind of an interesting thing. It is remarkable how good actors and directors can bring a story to life, but the one who created the story and laid out the blueprint for the film is not of interest.
It takes little thought, and seems to be a case of jumping on the band wagon, when pundits reflexively assail gun ownership and the right to carry as if that is the root of the problem. They sound like a broken record. I accused the main news media of being the government's sales force many decades ago, and it has only become moreso over time. They always seem to think that authoritarian rule is the answer.
When I saw that Costas had to do a little editorial during a football game, and heard the content of his message, I couldn't help but believe he was idiotically parroting the talking points of the usual neo-bolsheviks in order to gain cool guy points with the other useful idiots in the entertainment world. Surely he didn't really try to think this out.
It amazes me how easily people will jump on peer pressure causes if they think it will cast their image as cool and intellectual. Especially without the effort of really considering all the factors involved. This is why people can be led into some form of slave state cheering and with their consent.
Oh well. This is why decent and smart people should be breeding as fast as they can--the problem is cultural and the more good people that are put into the mix, the more likely it is that the culture will veer away from the Big Pretense and stepping on the sanctity and rights of the individual.
I suppose seeing the story of how Worcester, Mass. has been buying guns from people by offering a free flu shot and a grocery store gift card put me over the top on this. Turn in your weapons and we'll toss you a little treat! If I wanted my money to go toward buying guns, I'd buy them myself, not vote my tax money go toward that. Or your money. Maybe all the peace officers in that town are saints, and the thugs all lined up to trade weapons for vaccinations and food. Somehow I doubt it.
.
.
Metaphors and things.
For some reason I was thinking about football just before the game, and the coaches inspirational words.
I guess it would be more high school or college. I'm not sure if they give the same classic form of inspiration to a room full of millionaires with unions and contracts.
Whatever the venue, good words would be, "Save your hardest hit for first!" I wonder if anyone ever said that. Maybe Yogi Berra.
It is good advice because if you hit them harder and faster than they expect they'll be flinching a little the rest of the game. I know this to be true. They may come at you harder but then they are easier to go around.
The other thing was I keep thinking of how my brother is like the North Star in our family; steady, and he has always been able to hold pretty much to a path while being flexible enough to change course when necessary. It isn't something that just happens by luck.
He consciously sticks to a chosen path and doesn't apologize to those who would have him do things differently. That isn't always easy, but he's doing it right. We aren't close and may never be, but there is a very powerful bond between us. It could be that the strength of the deep bond makes it scary to be too close. We both probably feel like we let the other down. He may not. I do. With good enough experience to back both cases.
Life is like a bowl of cherries---chocolate is usually not in that bowl. Maybe they said that no one said life IS a bowl of cherries. Or did they say Life is a bowl of cherries? They say some odd things. But, say it enough and people take it for true.
I guess it would be more high school or college. I'm not sure if they give the same classic form of inspiration to a room full of millionaires with unions and contracts.
Whatever the venue, good words would be, "Save your hardest hit for first!" I wonder if anyone ever said that. Maybe Yogi Berra.
It is good advice because if you hit them harder and faster than they expect they'll be flinching a little the rest of the game. I know this to be true. They may come at you harder but then they are easier to go around.
The other thing was I keep thinking of how my brother is like the North Star in our family; steady, and he has always been able to hold pretty much to a path while being flexible enough to change course when necessary. It isn't something that just happens by luck.
He consciously sticks to a chosen path and doesn't apologize to those who would have him do things differently. That isn't always easy, but he's doing it right. We aren't close and may never be, but there is a very powerful bond between us. It could be that the strength of the deep bond makes it scary to be too close. We both probably feel like we let the other down. He may not. I do. With good enough experience to back both cases.
Life is like a bowl of cherries---chocolate is usually not in that bowl. Maybe they said that no one said life IS a bowl of cherries. Or did they say Life is a bowl of cherries? They say some odd things. But, say it enough and people take it for true.
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Let Me Sleep On it
What prompted it, I do not know. Mysteriously inspired, I wrote young k a lengthy letter; documenary treatise, autobiography, nonsense. I'm afraid if I send it I may wish I hadn't. I have not proofread it. I'm afraid that if I do, I'll trash it, then wish I hadn't.
I'll save it to a folder and check it out another time.
Why is it that people's wives, and women that don't really seem like a good mix go out of their way to flatter you? If what they say is true then life ought to be different. It should roll off but it tends to depress me. In many contexts it would be considered complimentary. But, I have found that if you look beyond the surface, and you really search, you'll find the depressing side of a thing. Usually I don't look at much. This one was just there. Depression said, I'm gonna hit a home run! But I know what is what, so it doesn't matter.
Ha. I have the last laugh. Years of experience have numbed me to the point of only being mildly depressed by depression, so Depression has to settle for almost nothing. Depression will soon get depressed and go away.
I'll save it to a folder and check it out another time.
Why is it that people's wives, and women that don't really seem like a good mix go out of their way to flatter you? If what they say is true then life ought to be different. It should roll off but it tends to depress me. In many contexts it would be considered complimentary. But, I have found that if you look beyond the surface, and you really search, you'll find the depressing side of a thing. Usually I don't look at much. This one was just there. Depression said, I'm gonna hit a home run! But I know what is what, so it doesn't matter.
Ha. I have the last laugh. Years of experience have numbed me to the point of only being mildly depressed by depression, so Depression has to settle for almost nothing. Depression will soon get depressed and go away.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
It is a - I don't know--life
There may be a better or cheaper way, but I like the idea of home geothermal heating and cooling systems. Mostly they just drill down a fairly long way. The hole is not very big. Then they stick in a U shaped tube so that fluid can go down, either lose or gain heat, then go back up and exchange heat to cool or heat the home. They do a lot of in-floor radiant heating. Just a bunch of back and forth coils built into the floor.
That is not the only way to do it. They also do horizontal trenches of unknown-to-me depth. Probably about 6 feet. So, if you are burying people in the yard, you can kill two birds with one stone, so to speak.
The pics are from Home Geothermal Systems, LLC. North Dakota, I think. They apparently do this vertical thing about 180 feet straight down. Yikes. That works some places.
These systems can also be placed in an existing well or pond, depending upon what those venues have to offer in the way of desired heat or cooling.
Supposedly there is a three to five year payback. That may take into account government subsidies and other garbage. Sick. But not everyone sees the damage that subsidies can do to innovation, and how it opens wide the door to cronyism and corruption. Solyndra is the poster child for that.
What interests me is that a system I conceived on paper, years ago, would work well with this. My loop was intended to be a part of another device, but also had stand alone uses. My ex roommate, and alleged friend, Bill, saw this design, and I explained it to him. After I was out of town, he filed for and received a patent on it, and formed a company which supported him and his family for a long time.
I discovered his theft of the idea some time later, but did not bother to take action. I may even have the original drawings and probably could have proved my claim. At any rate, I have no qualms about using my idea if opportunity arises.
My system was called a Heat Pipe by Bill's company. It is a closed system with freon-like refrigerant, but uses check valves and restrictors to control the flow which is induced by the temperature differential between the extreme ends of the coil. In the geothermal case, between the above ground temp and the below ground temp.
No motors, electricity, pulleys, or animals required. It is a passive system which takes advantage of the low boiling point of freon, and uses it to transfer or absorb heat. I give Bill credit for knowing a good design, and for proving the aspect of the bigger picture of which I was only 90% sure. I thought it would work, but I always felt better when I discovered it had been proven.
The advantage of geothermal is that the temp of the earth, six feet down or so, is relatively constant year round; 68-72 deg F. So you aren't hoping the sunshines or the wind blows. It is low maintenance and long lasting.
My thought is that there is probably a way to do it which might require less depth than the vertical method, and less mess and excavation than some of the other installations I've seen pictured on various sites. It is definitely something to consider when embarking on new construction. In most places I've lived, it would make a lot of sense to install the system under the foundation.
I'm always into retro-fit. I think finding ways to work with existing structures to fit a geothermal heating/cooling source is worth doing. There are always what-ifs, and abundant fuel for the devil's advocate, associated with such ideas. That is what engineering is for--knock down the obstacles. Find a way to solve each discrepancy. I know some people who love the role of devil's advocate. I'm not one who does very well in that job.
Usually, there is a basic premise to such an idea--like, there is a constant heat source which can be tapped. In this case, cooling is involved too, but it is all heat, either being transfered to the dwelling or from it. Then the judgement is made that this would be useful if harnessed. Then there is the how-to question, and that is where one can go to town citing potential problems. Doesn't mean it can't be done.
Obviously, this one is being done. There are companies with trucks and big earth drills which do nothing but geothermal work. They do not appear to be on to my design for the coil system which is the heat transfer mechanism. Food for thought.
I sometimes want to get involved in this just to see how sticky it would get in dealing with Bill's patent which was directly stolen from me. I give Bill credit for making it happen, but have no respect for people who take credit for the ideas of others. I feel certain he'd acquiesce if I had to get anything cleared through him.
It wasn't that big a surprise. Bill was that way. A go getter, and what Bill wanted, Bill went after, no matter the consequences to anyone else. It is a funny brand of greed that infects certain people, and results in them wanting something so badly that they just can't let it go, even when it means crossing boundaries of decency and honor to soothe the desire.
The cool thing was that my theorized system proved to work. I thought it would but had no tangible proof. Thanks Bill, you crazed lunatic.
Apparently North Dakota has it going on. Employment is up, oil is there, and they aren't as hog tied with insane nanny state PC activities as California and other places. Then again, they don't have the disadvantage of being spoiled by good weather and nice geography the way we are in San Diego.
.
The pics are from Home Geothermal Systems, LLC. North Dakota, I think. They apparently do this vertical thing about 180 feet straight down. Yikes. That works some places.
These systems can also be placed in an existing well or pond, depending upon what those venues have to offer in the way of desired heat or cooling.
Supposedly there is a three to five year payback. That may take into account government subsidies and other garbage. Sick. But not everyone sees the damage that subsidies can do to innovation, and how it opens wide the door to cronyism and corruption. Solyndra is the poster child for that.
What interests me is that a system I conceived on paper, years ago, would work well with this. My loop was intended to be a part of another device, but also had stand alone uses. My ex roommate, and alleged friend, Bill, saw this design, and I explained it to him. After I was out of town, he filed for and received a patent on it, and formed a company which supported him and his family for a long time.
I discovered his theft of the idea some time later, but did not bother to take action. I may even have the original drawings and probably could have proved my claim. At any rate, I have no qualms about using my idea if opportunity arises.
My system was called a Heat Pipe by Bill's company. It is a closed system with freon-like refrigerant, but uses check valves and restrictors to control the flow which is induced by the temperature differential between the extreme ends of the coil. In the geothermal case, between the above ground temp and the below ground temp.
No motors, electricity, pulleys, or animals required. It is a passive system which takes advantage of the low boiling point of freon, and uses it to transfer or absorb heat. I give Bill credit for knowing a good design, and for proving the aspect of the bigger picture of which I was only 90% sure. I thought it would work, but I always felt better when I discovered it had been proven.
The advantage of geothermal is that the temp of the earth, six feet down or so, is relatively constant year round; 68-72 deg F. So you aren't hoping the sunshines or the wind blows. It is low maintenance and long lasting.
My thought is that there is probably a way to do it which might require less depth than the vertical method, and less mess and excavation than some of the other installations I've seen pictured on various sites. It is definitely something to consider when embarking on new construction. In most places I've lived, it would make a lot of sense to install the system under the foundation.
I'm always into retro-fit. I think finding ways to work with existing structures to fit a geothermal heating/cooling source is worth doing. There are always what-ifs, and abundant fuel for the devil's advocate, associated with such ideas. That is what engineering is for--knock down the obstacles. Find a way to solve each discrepancy. I know some people who love the role of devil's advocate. I'm not one who does very well in that job.
Usually, there is a basic premise to such an idea--like, there is a constant heat source which can be tapped. In this case, cooling is involved too, but it is all heat, either being transfered to the dwelling or from it. Then the judgement is made that this would be useful if harnessed. Then there is the how-to question, and that is where one can go to town citing potential problems. Doesn't mean it can't be done.
Obviously, this one is being done. There are companies with trucks and big earth drills which do nothing but geothermal work. They do not appear to be on to my design for the coil system which is the heat transfer mechanism. Food for thought.
I sometimes want to get involved in this just to see how sticky it would get in dealing with Bill's patent which was directly stolen from me. I give Bill credit for making it happen, but have no respect for people who take credit for the ideas of others. I feel certain he'd acquiesce if I had to get anything cleared through him.
It wasn't that big a surprise. Bill was that way. A go getter, and what Bill wanted, Bill went after, no matter the consequences to anyone else. It is a funny brand of greed that infects certain people, and results in them wanting something so badly that they just can't let it go, even when it means crossing boundaries of decency and honor to soothe the desire.
The cool thing was that my theorized system proved to work. I thought it would but had no tangible proof. Thanks Bill, you crazed lunatic.
Apparently North Dakota has it going on. Employment is up, oil is there, and they aren't as hog tied with insane nanny state PC activities as California and other places. Then again, they don't have the disadvantage of being spoiled by good weather and nice geography the way we are in San Diego.
.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Diatonic Harmonica Tips;what I know, part 11272012
Given that the world of freedom philosophy is uninteresting to most Americans and almost all the rest of the world, I'm trying to confine myself to what I know of more tangible skills and facts. That is not a promise, as I tend to compulsively come back to "What in the world are you neo-bolsheviks thinking?", and that inevitably leads to a tirade against grouping ideas and opportunities according to ethnic and genetic characteristics.
For example, why is it code for racism if you think someone has lied or is a nincompoop? No racial group, or gender faction is immune from being idiots. Oh well, people sucker for the largeness of the mob and the omnipotence of governments.
Here are some things about diatonic harmonica which many people do not know--even those who play a lot of music. I've found that most of the people who sing, play guitar, and have that harmonica holder around their neck for hands-free play, tend to play straight harp and do not know much about cross harp and other positions.
It helps a lot if one knows the notes on a keyboard because it is easier to figure out what harp to use with what key when you can picture a keyboard.
Cross harp, or second position, is good for most tunes, especially blues, rock, most country, and the like. You get more power notes because you are inhaling on the dominate chord, and draw notes have more oompf than blow notes. Except the highest three or four, then blowing is the bees knees.
How do you know what harp is the cross harp?
If the tune is in the key of X, you count up five notes, including sharps and flats, and that is the key of harp to use.
Example. Song is in G. So five up is Ab, A, Bb, B, C. Use C for crossharp on G tunes.
The lower case b means flat--half step down.
I discovered that many players do not know the keyboard notes so they aren't readily conversant with where the black keys (sharps and flats) reside.
Notice how C is the one before the group which has only two black keys. C and F have no flat--a black key just left of it. E and B have no sharp--black key just to the right.
It is odd, but how it works that C is generally the anchor point. The key of C contains no sharps or flats to get the scale. do ray mi fa so la ti do, or whatever. Start with other notes and there will be a black key or two which is used to make the scale work right.
If they learn by memory, Ab, A, Bb, B, C, Db, D, Eb, E, F, Gb, G,(and series repeats) then they can count up and down to know the harp to use. Often, you may hear mention of C sharp or F sharp. For harp figuring purposes, just know that a half step up from C--C sharp--is the same as a half step down from D--D flat; Db.
Third position is often used for minor keys, and is figured by counting two down from the tune's key.
Example; song in A minor can be accompanied on a G harp. Two down from A would be Ab, G. Use G.
In third position you may lack some notes, need to bend to hit others, and work around the melody rather than duplicate it. I've often had to use C for D minor because I couldn't find my D minor harp. They make harmonicas in both natural and harmonic minor keys. I use natural minor tuning a lot. Those harps are labeled in cross harp, meaning that one which is E minor in straight harp--the natural key if dominate notes are ones you blow to achieve--is labeled A minor since that is the cross harp, 2nd position Key.
I know a guy who is very fast and good on straight harp but finds controlling and using bends on cross harp quite difficult.
Bends(lowering pitch) and overblows (raising the pitch) on harmonica are actually achieved by changing how the air flows in the reed chamber, not by playing harder.
For some reason, they still sell harps which are virtually useless. About the lowest end I'd go is Hohner Big River. Sometimes Susuki Easy Rider is playable. A very cheap harp in C. Forget other cheap ones. Not worth the trouble, especially for someone trying to learn. The person could think the problem is lack of skill when they have a crummy harmonica that no one could play well.
I like Lee Oskar harps, Bushman, Special 20, Marine Band, and whatever they have that costs more. I haven't owned those. The cost of harmonicas has gone up dramatically in the last few years. I was stunned by msrp of $30 and more. Now they list for $50 or more. Lee Oskars and Marine Bands do. Crazy. Unless you want to rework the thing to optimize for overblow, you are better off with Lee Oskar instruments. They last longer and are a little more mellow and warm.
I guess the thing is that not all players have a picture of a keyboard in their minds. My piano training must not be completely forgotten. In a pamphlet by Charlie Musselwhite I learned the easy thing of counting up five, including the black keys, to find the crossharp. Other people talk of choosing a harp that is a fourth above. They have a more tedious way of getting there, but one used by music nerds--circle of fourths and lots of wild diagrams. Whatever works.
5 up, 2 down. That's it. Also, experiment. Sometimes using the same key harp as the song works. Sometimes using the third position, two down works, and most of the time 5 up, crossharp is the ticket.
Crossharp can also work on minors, so try both 2nd and 3rd position to see what is best.
Or go buy some minor keys. I like Lee Oskar or Bushman Soul's Voice for that. You get Bushman at harpdepot.com. Other harps can be found at musician's friend online, or coast2coastmusic.com. Coast2coast has all kinds of things. I bought two or three microphones over the years there.
Wait a minute. If I count the Shaker Mics, I've probably bought five mics from them.
Anyway, for anyone who wants to learn blues harp or any other style of harmonica, I suggest learning guitar or keyboard instead. If you still want to play the stupid harmonica, then get a good C, D, or A harp, more if you got bucks, and learn to pick out tunes. Work to make a decent tone. Learn to play single notes, then learn to bend the draw notes at the lower end. You bend down in pitch. And then learn to bend the last three or so high notes blowing out.
Much good instruction on youtube, but I can never follow the people who get too technicified. Even this bit I wrote sounds tedious or complicated. It is one instrument you learn by feel. Or I did.
It is very easy to play, almost impossible to play like I'd like. Lots of great players. Only some play what I care to hear. I only sometimes play what I care to hear.
We'll probably see you on the lamb in a few years as all the healthcare fugitives become vagabond hoboes, running from the law, playing out our woes on the mouth harp over a can of stew on a makeshift fireplace by the railroad tracks.
All because we couldn't quite meet the law and afford rent and food, too.
..
For example, why is it code for racism if you think someone has lied or is a nincompoop? No racial group, or gender faction is immune from being idiots. Oh well, people sucker for the largeness of the mob and the omnipotence of governments.
Here are some things about diatonic harmonica which many people do not know--even those who play a lot of music. I've found that most of the people who sing, play guitar, and have that harmonica holder around their neck for hands-free play, tend to play straight harp and do not know much about cross harp and other positions.
It helps a lot if one knows the notes on a keyboard because it is easier to figure out what harp to use with what key when you can picture a keyboard.
Cross harp, or second position, is good for most tunes, especially blues, rock, most country, and the like. You get more power notes because you are inhaling on the dominate chord, and draw notes have more oompf than blow notes. Except the highest three or four, then blowing is the bees knees.
How do you know what harp is the cross harp?
If the tune is in the key of X, you count up five notes, including sharps and flats, and that is the key of harp to use.
Example. Song is in G. So five up is Ab, A, Bb, B, C. Use C for crossharp on G tunes.
The lower case b means flat--half step down.
I discovered that many players do not know the keyboard notes so they aren't readily conversant with where the black keys (sharps and flats) reside.
Notice how C is the one before the group which has only two black keys. C and F have no flat--a black key just left of it. E and B have no sharp--black key just to the right.
It is odd, but how it works that C is generally the anchor point. The key of C contains no sharps or flats to get the scale. do ray mi fa so la ti do, or whatever. Start with other notes and there will be a black key or two which is used to make the scale work right.
If they learn by memory, Ab, A, Bb, B, C, Db, D, Eb, E, F, Gb, G,(and series repeats) then they can count up and down to know the harp to use. Often, you may hear mention of C sharp or F sharp. For harp figuring purposes, just know that a half step up from C--C sharp--is the same as a half step down from D--D flat; Db.
Third position is often used for minor keys, and is figured by counting two down from the tune's key.
Example; song in A minor can be accompanied on a G harp. Two down from A would be Ab, G. Use G.
In third position you may lack some notes, need to bend to hit others, and work around the melody rather than duplicate it. I've often had to use C for D minor because I couldn't find my D minor harp. They make harmonicas in both natural and harmonic minor keys. I use natural minor tuning a lot. Those harps are labeled in cross harp, meaning that one which is E minor in straight harp--the natural key if dominate notes are ones you blow to achieve--is labeled A minor since that is the cross harp, 2nd position Key.
I know a guy who is very fast and good on straight harp but finds controlling and using bends on cross harp quite difficult.
Bends(lowering pitch) and overblows (raising the pitch) on harmonica are actually achieved by changing how the air flows in the reed chamber, not by playing harder.
For some reason, they still sell harps which are virtually useless. About the lowest end I'd go is Hohner Big River. Sometimes Susuki Easy Rider is playable. A very cheap harp in C. Forget other cheap ones. Not worth the trouble, especially for someone trying to learn. The person could think the problem is lack of skill when they have a crummy harmonica that no one could play well.
I like Lee Oskar harps, Bushman, Special 20, Marine Band, and whatever they have that costs more. I haven't owned those. The cost of harmonicas has gone up dramatically in the last few years. I was stunned by msrp of $30 and more. Now they list for $50 or more. Lee Oskars and Marine Bands do. Crazy. Unless you want to rework the thing to optimize for overblow, you are better off with Lee Oskar instruments. They last longer and are a little more mellow and warm.
I guess the thing is that not all players have a picture of a keyboard in their minds. My piano training must not be completely forgotten. In a pamphlet by Charlie Musselwhite I learned the easy thing of counting up five, including the black keys, to find the crossharp. Other people talk of choosing a harp that is a fourth above. They have a more tedious way of getting there, but one used by music nerds--circle of fourths and lots of wild diagrams. Whatever works.
5 up, 2 down. That's it. Also, experiment. Sometimes using the same key harp as the song works. Sometimes using the third position, two down works, and most of the time 5 up, crossharp is the ticket.
Crossharp can also work on minors, so try both 2nd and 3rd position to see what is best.
Or go buy some minor keys. I like Lee Oskar or Bushman Soul's Voice for that. You get Bushman at harpdepot.com. Other harps can be found at musician's friend online, or coast2coastmusic.com. Coast2coast has all kinds of things. I bought two or three microphones over the years there.
Wait a minute. If I count the Shaker Mics, I've probably bought five mics from them.
Anyway, for anyone who wants to learn blues harp or any other style of harmonica, I suggest learning guitar or keyboard instead. If you still want to play the stupid harmonica, then get a good C, D, or A harp, more if you got bucks, and learn to pick out tunes. Work to make a decent tone. Learn to play single notes, then learn to bend the draw notes at the lower end. You bend down in pitch. And then learn to bend the last three or so high notes blowing out.
Much good instruction on youtube, but I can never follow the people who get too technicified. Even this bit I wrote sounds tedious or complicated. It is one instrument you learn by feel. Or I did.
It is very easy to play, almost impossible to play like I'd like. Lots of great players. Only some play what I care to hear. I only sometimes play what I care to hear.
All because we couldn't quite meet the law and afford rent and food, too.
..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- John0 Juanderlust
- Ballistic Mountain, CA, United States
- Like spring on a summer's day
Followers
Blog Archive
- ► 2016 (175)
- ► 2015 (183)
- ► 2014 (139)
- ► 2013 (186)
- ► 2012 (287)
- ► 2011 (362)
- ► 2010 (270)



