It is getting pretty bad when one of the click bait things on the side of the facebook page says, "10 Celebs Who Suck In The Bedroom", or something close to it. I refused to click. Besides one mans trash is another's treasure.
How dumb and idiotic is a society where something like that will attract huge numbers of viewers/clickers. I think they use the word "suck" here as more of an adjective than a verb. Although, either way, how do the authors of this nonsense know?
Of course there is that optimistic side of me that wants to cheer and exclaim, "Yay!!! There are famous hotshot celebrities who are as bad in the bedroom as I am. Yipee!!". But what if it is all lies, and no one is as bad as I am? Now that would suck. Yet, the famous are the ones being publicly graded and subjected to these unpleasant assertions. I fly under the radar.
Who told the meme machine who was so bad in bed? If it was their partners, then I have to wonder if maybe it is the blabber mouths who suck. How could the others be any good if their riffraff trash dishing partners are hopelessly incapable of rewarding intimacy?
It is sad on so many levels. Really bodes poorly for the species. I can understand stupid wastes of time, but the stuff of this nature indicates people are so unhappy and feel like such failures that they want to feel better by trashing others. People they don't even know.
How can the same species of creature invent and build and make use of air conditioning and also pedal such moronic tripe? It boggles the mind.
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Hidden Comments since 2016 Finally Appear
Just now I discovered that people have commented on some of these screams in vacuum which I put here. It used to notify my email, but only sometimes. I never could understand that. At the very least when I came to this site there would be an indication that comments were awaiting moderation.
I did that due to spammers who would paste a book of nonsense and evil code into a comment. That way I could prevent it from appearing at all. Also the impolite stalker lady from Memphis was getting rather nasty, years ago.
No indication of pending comments has been visible anywhere. So I never went to moderation page. But today I see in email a notice that a comment has been submitted. Some nonsense from either an illiterate or one whose first language is not English. It was an irrelevant nonsense comment on something written years ago.
That is what brought me to the moderation page. Crazy.
Not that there were very many comments. But there were a few.
One suggested a little fear over Trumps foreign policy prospects. This was probably right after the election. No one I consider safe in that realm has achieved great political success.
To me, having Sessions in as AG causes me to worry more about domestic policy. I tend to hate prosecutors. And he is one of those who would go after things that are stupid to chase but which whittle away rights. He strikes me as all wrong on marijuana laws and abortion or other things not legitimately under purview of the feds. Some things are better at state or even down to the individual citizen to decide.
So, while Trump is criticized for criticizing his own attorney general, I am glad to see it, hoping his next one is less of a zealot. Obama liked to pick partisan racists. I would love to see an actually constitutionalist in that role. But the actual law of the land is so inconvenient to the agenda of most law enforcement. Bizarre.
I did that due to spammers who would paste a book of nonsense and evil code into a comment. That way I could prevent it from appearing at all. Also the impolite stalker lady from Memphis was getting rather nasty, years ago.
No indication of pending comments has been visible anywhere. So I never went to moderation page. But today I see in email a notice that a comment has been submitted. Some nonsense from either an illiterate or one whose first language is not English. It was an irrelevant nonsense comment on something written years ago.
That is what brought me to the moderation page. Crazy.
Not that there were very many comments. But there were a few.
One suggested a little fear over Trumps foreign policy prospects. This was probably right after the election. No one I consider safe in that realm has achieved great political success.
To me, having Sessions in as AG causes me to worry more about domestic policy. I tend to hate prosecutors. And he is one of those who would go after things that are stupid to chase but which whittle away rights. He strikes me as all wrong on marijuana laws and abortion or other things not legitimately under purview of the feds. Some things are better at state or even down to the individual citizen to decide.
So, while Trump is criticized for criticizing his own attorney general, I am glad to see it, hoping his next one is less of a zealot. Obama liked to pick partisan racists. I would love to see an actually constitutionalist in that role. But the actual law of the land is so inconvenient to the agenda of most law enforcement. Bizarre.
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Not a Good Idea
There are long stretches of time in which I only speak to those I can't avoid. Coworkers and such. I'll catch myself going into too much detail or misreading the comprehension of ideas, etc. Then I'll feel foolish and shut up.
I look back and realize no one who is not mentally damaged in some way, either just naturally or from some event or something, would have such a disjointed and empty slate. I am frozen and have been to some degree since age 4. It just seems to have become stronger as I got older. I welcome the thaw. I long for the thaw. I am scared to death of all of it. Whatever that means.
I can keep saying it is not over, but it will be any minute so saying that is just another of the lies and tricks I use on myself. How or why that works, I don't know. I wish it weren't so hot some places or so full of hateful people or so cold or crowded. One day I will leave here. I tend to run from friends and associate with people who see the weakness and think they can have fun shredding me. Only idiots have such issues, so I blame me more than them.
Decent people don't have to think about friends who kill them, figuratively, and all the other stuff riffraff does. Some people don't have that thing where they feel like they live underwater in the muck.
There is no visible reason for any of this. There was some medical stuff but the symptoms are no longer so intense or debilitating.
Flying to TX for a few days. Some gig outside Austin, maybe in Georgetown, on Aug. 4. That will be a good break. I am scared to even go, but the die is cast.
This, whatever it is, has been going on forever. Anyone in my world would be sick of witnessing it or hearing about it.. Good thing I have so few people in my world. But if there are people who will betray trust or see that tender place to pierce with the knife, I will find and welcome them. And that is no good.
I look back and realize no one who is not mentally damaged in some way, either just naturally or from some event or something, would have such a disjointed and empty slate. I am frozen and have been to some degree since age 4. It just seems to have become stronger as I got older. I welcome the thaw. I long for the thaw. I am scared to death of all of it. Whatever that means.
I can keep saying it is not over, but it will be any minute so saying that is just another of the lies and tricks I use on myself. How or why that works, I don't know. I wish it weren't so hot some places or so full of hateful people or so cold or crowded. One day I will leave here. I tend to run from friends and associate with people who see the weakness and think they can have fun shredding me. Only idiots have such issues, so I blame me more than them.
Decent people don't have to think about friends who kill them, figuratively, and all the other stuff riffraff does. Some people don't have that thing where they feel like they live underwater in the muck.
There is no visible reason for any of this. There was some medical stuff but the symptoms are no longer so intense or debilitating.
Flying to TX for a few days. Some gig outside Austin, maybe in Georgetown, on Aug. 4. That will be a good break. I am scared to even go, but the die is cast.
This, whatever it is, has been going on forever. Anyone in my world would be sick of witnessing it or hearing about it.. Good thing I have so few people in my world. But if there are people who will betray trust or see that tender place to pierce with the knife, I will find and welcome them. And that is no good.
Monday, July 17, 2017
I Finally Distilled the Privilege Movement
You are reinforcing tribalism, insisting upon it, under the banner of vanquishing tribalism. Privilege stems from that. What you are calling privilege is always what the majority and/or powerful in all societies take for themselves. As soon as any group gains the numbers they grant their own special privilege.
Some individuals have evolved past that, but most people have not. I am talking all ethnicities. Back in the day your white privilege did squat for you in Harlem. And to this day, just go to the non-white areas of the city, or anywhere in Memphis, and tell me how that white privilege is working.
Mostly, it doesn't work outside your own territory. But if you claim your territory is so vast that the sun doesn't set on it, chances are you are wielding your privilege thanks to your superior weapons and understanding of how they work. When you privilege at gunpoint, it ruffles the feathers of the highly populous under class. Bad thing to do and they end up with trouble for all.
Now they are creating fantasies about privilege. Guilt, I think, for many, greed for others. Pretty much trying to unprivilege at gunpoint and reason it from a hyper-tribal perspective. And that's the problem; necessity to punish under assumption that this is a uniquely whit phenomenon and sickness.
Every dominate group has done that obnoxious form of discrimination in one form or another forever. Sometimes it is a leave or die kind of deal.
If you want to blame everyone for their ancestors, no one is left innocent. Maybe that rainforest group that they ruined just by exposing them to modern humanity, and a machete.
Everyone else is not innocent of whatever it is that is used to lament and bemoan and fabricate privilege. A little current reality, a lot current fantasy.
The far left tell us that a society in which race and ethnicity are neither considered character virtues, nor sins, somehow doesn't work out. And how dare you cook Mexican food if you aren't Mexican. Or sell a Ferrari if you aren't Italian. Something about hijacking cultures? It is a different word buZzing about. The privilege police would know.
The entire Aztec nation was built on commandeering other tribes and their cultures. It is where they got most of the cool engineering, and scientifically advanced aspects of their culture. They were just thugs at the outset, like most. If culture did not incorporate advances and practices developed by others, we would be more backward than we are.
The problem is that discrimination based on color and such had become very much the exception rather than the norm, and was trending toward even more nondiscriminatory. People who profit from the abuse (Jesse, Al, et al) felt threatened. The demagogues who keep in office by scaring groups, keeping them ignorant and in poverty, could not have been pleased.
So now they push segregation claiming pulling people out of a murderous, ignorant, destitute way of life is robbing them of their identity. So, they convince them that their culture is that of the pimps, drug dealers, and violent criminals. So, they dress like, talk like, act like gangstas. And they even have their own spelling. This has nothing to do with an actual culture and is an insult but greed blinds people from seeing it. The greed to be a victim and free of all bounds. To a victim, any violence or larceny is just, self defense, survival, war.
If you want a just society, so be it. But punishing or rewarding based upon condition of birth is as elitist and creepy as monarchy.
Some individuals have evolved past that, but most people have not. I am talking all ethnicities. Back in the day your white privilege did squat for you in Harlem. And to this day, just go to the non-white areas of the city, or anywhere in Memphis, and tell me how that white privilege is working.
Mostly, it doesn't work outside your own territory. But if you claim your territory is so vast that the sun doesn't set on it, chances are you are wielding your privilege thanks to your superior weapons and understanding of how they work. When you privilege at gunpoint, it ruffles the feathers of the highly populous under class. Bad thing to do and they end up with trouble for all.
Now they are creating fantasies about privilege. Guilt, I think, for many, greed for others. Pretty much trying to unprivilege at gunpoint and reason it from a hyper-tribal perspective. And that's the problem; necessity to punish under assumption that this is a uniquely whit phenomenon and sickness.
Every dominate group has done that obnoxious form of discrimination in one form or another forever. Sometimes it is a leave or die kind of deal.
If you want to blame everyone for their ancestors, no one is left innocent. Maybe that rainforest group that they ruined just by exposing them to modern humanity, and a machete.
Everyone else is not innocent of whatever it is that is used to lament and bemoan and fabricate privilege. A little current reality, a lot current fantasy.
The far left tell us that a society in which race and ethnicity are neither considered character virtues, nor sins, somehow doesn't work out. And how dare you cook Mexican food if you aren't Mexican. Or sell a Ferrari if you aren't Italian. Something about hijacking cultures? It is a different word buZzing about. The privilege police would know.
The entire Aztec nation was built on commandeering other tribes and their cultures. It is where they got most of the cool engineering, and scientifically advanced aspects of their culture. They were just thugs at the outset, like most. If culture did not incorporate advances and practices developed by others, we would be more backward than we are.
The problem is that discrimination based on color and such had become very much the exception rather than the norm, and was trending toward even more nondiscriminatory. People who profit from the abuse (Jesse, Al, et al) felt threatened. The demagogues who keep in office by scaring groups, keeping them ignorant and in poverty, could not have been pleased.
So now they push segregation claiming pulling people out of a murderous, ignorant, destitute way of life is robbing them of their identity. So, they convince them that their culture is that of the pimps, drug dealers, and violent criminals. So, they dress like, talk like, act like gangstas. And they even have their own spelling. This has nothing to do with an actual culture and is an insult but greed blinds people from seeing it. The greed to be a victim and free of all bounds. To a victim, any violence or larceny is just, self defense, survival, war.
If you want a just society, so be it. But punishing or rewarding based upon condition of birth is as elitist and creepy as monarchy.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
The Not So Intelligentsia, but just enough
Before delving into the meat of the current matter, I will mention that I hid from view my post explaining that I am so lame that I let an absurdly critical, self-proclaimed friend, remove any joy or freedom I find in writing. I used to enjoy it.
I am trying to once again. Like I am buying that it is an act of friendship to offer such unsolicited views, and then rudely argue them. All to help me reach my full potential. No. That is purely insane and bizarre.
But the real deal is that there are so many charismatic people who possess the ability to speak fluently in a way that makes anything, even nonsense, at least sound valid and profound. But they are just short of how intelligent they seem to believe themselves to be.
No use arguing it though. People are so in love with their conclusions that even smart people run a line of distorted facts in their greed to sell their point. Their greed for your acquiescence.
Most of the smartass political rhetoric out there is flawed, skewed and one sided. People sucker for the either-or choices pushed on them. Granted, there can be made the argument that these positions and parties snowballed from what people want and gravitated into two basic warring factions.
I believe that argument would be a case of a little truth being used to sell a lie. People are wanters. No argument there.
Civic action, mutual protection and common interests of communities are part of how humans survive. Then it gets taken over by con men and apparent demons of some kind. Perhaps mutants or a curse from extra terrestrials.
We do not even blink at friggin' family power dynasties in our government. Does that set off no red flags? Probably not. That is because people can only think so many steps back in the cause-and-effect chain. Often those things are mislabeled. Try arguing that point with the belligerent. No thanks.
People are becoming unreasonably unhinged but still following the track laid out by the meme and talking point factories of their choice. A guy actually said you are more likely to get hit by a republican drunk driver than killed by gang members or terrorists. Really? That was in a back and forth about sanctuary cities and not liking party crashers does not mean you hate all Mexicans. Stuff that only needs explaining because people are so greedy for power.
The next best thing if you can't have real power, is real anger. Someone or thing to hate. Because of that greed, people will ignore the ridiculous rhetoric and behavior as long as it supports the ultimate point. The conclusion that feels good, that frees them to behave as violently as they want, because it is self defense. They are fighting for their rights.
Just ask them. Really, you don't need to because they are rather vocal and self serving. For some reason, in order to refute a contrary point of view, they need to make up dire statistics and stories, circumventing plain logic and truth. Sometimes the conclusion can be supported reasonably. Sometimes not.
Smart enough to fight for a cause and enjoy the freedom of victimhood and anger, but not quite smart enough to actually dissect the issue they support/oppose to be sure it is right. Plus if it is a bandwagon opportunity, most people jump on. Makes them feel like they can pretend to think without going to any real effort. They don't even realize it half the time, is what I think.
That is why it is useless, and even dangerous to push the argument with them.
Recently I skimmed an article bemoaning criticisms of higher education by "conservatives". It went on to the extreme type of ignoramus who would claim, "If it good 'nuff fer ma daddy then it good nuff fer me". They cut you off. The article tries to make you think any criticism of their insane policies, all out propaganda assault on students and community, narrow mindedness, and heavy handedness toward the innocent, means you hate knowledge, are republican, and resist all manner of essential elements vital to the very survival of our species.
Sounds like the Dade County public schools of my youth. The students that get crushed or fall through the cracks in this system. It is kind of cruel. And it isn't what you see promoted. What is promoted is only vote pandering. Much is nonsense.
The perpetual victim status of all these divisions which have nothing to do with whether you are worth a damn as a human or not, is now ensured to continue indefinitely as we immerse ourselves in the hatred and contemplation of "privilege". You cannot have the privilege of which we speak without someone being victimized. Almost everyone has the opportunity to be a victim. No need to state the obvious, especially because you get labeled as something you are not if you do. Got to be a universal oppressor somewhere...
And it is true in some ways. What people refuse to do is to stick to the truth in their stories and examples, even when truth is there. That extra bit of exaggeration, the little omission.
See? Smart enough to catch a understand a bit, but not stalwart enough to stick to truth and try to look back several steps to see what was going on up to now; to double check their story.
We don't have much info indicating humans were ever at peace. But I hold that we really don't know. They keep finding older evidence of the species.
But the ones who actually consider themselves "the masses" (ugly term) can actually be convinced that the African continent was in peaceful bliss, that the Aztecs were at one with nature and a big love fest of a nation before europeans hit the shore.
I am not saying I am a fan of Inquisition period Spain or any of that. But that does not justify lying about the rest of the world. That is what made the philosophy espoused in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in our Constitution so important and cutting edge. And yet people still look for kings and queens and lords and masters; "Camelot", my ass.
I am trying to once again. Like I am buying that it is an act of friendship to offer such unsolicited views, and then rudely argue them. All to help me reach my full potential. No. That is purely insane and bizarre.
But the real deal is that there are so many charismatic people who possess the ability to speak fluently in a way that makes anything, even nonsense, at least sound valid and profound. But they are just short of how intelligent they seem to believe themselves to be.
No use arguing it though. People are so in love with their conclusions that even smart people run a line of distorted facts in their greed to sell their point. Their greed for your acquiescence.
Most of the smartass political rhetoric out there is flawed, skewed and one sided. People sucker for the either-or choices pushed on them. Granted, there can be made the argument that these positions and parties snowballed from what people want and gravitated into two basic warring factions.
I believe that argument would be a case of a little truth being used to sell a lie. People are wanters. No argument there.
Civic action, mutual protection and common interests of communities are part of how humans survive. Then it gets taken over by con men and apparent demons of some kind. Perhaps mutants or a curse from extra terrestrials.
We do not even blink at friggin' family power dynasties in our government. Does that set off no red flags? Probably not. That is because people can only think so many steps back in the cause-and-effect chain. Often those things are mislabeled. Try arguing that point with the belligerent. No thanks.
People are becoming unreasonably unhinged but still following the track laid out by the meme and talking point factories of their choice. A guy actually said you are more likely to get hit by a republican drunk driver than killed by gang members or terrorists. Really? That was in a back and forth about sanctuary cities and not liking party crashers does not mean you hate all Mexicans. Stuff that only needs explaining because people are so greedy for power.
The next best thing if you can't have real power, is real anger. Someone or thing to hate. Because of that greed, people will ignore the ridiculous rhetoric and behavior as long as it supports the ultimate point. The conclusion that feels good, that frees them to behave as violently as they want, because it is self defense. They are fighting for their rights.
Just ask them. Really, you don't need to because they are rather vocal and self serving. For some reason, in order to refute a contrary point of view, they need to make up dire statistics and stories, circumventing plain logic and truth. Sometimes the conclusion can be supported reasonably. Sometimes not.
Smart enough to fight for a cause and enjoy the freedom of victimhood and anger, but not quite smart enough to actually dissect the issue they support/oppose to be sure it is right. Plus if it is a bandwagon opportunity, most people jump on. Makes them feel like they can pretend to think without going to any real effort. They don't even realize it half the time, is what I think.
That is why it is useless, and even dangerous to push the argument with them.
Recently I skimmed an article bemoaning criticisms of higher education by "conservatives". It went on to the extreme type of ignoramus who would claim, "If it good 'nuff fer ma daddy then it good nuff fer me". They cut you off. The article tries to make you think any criticism of their insane policies, all out propaganda assault on students and community, narrow mindedness, and heavy handedness toward the innocent, means you hate knowledge, are republican, and resist all manner of essential elements vital to the very survival of our species.
Sounds like the Dade County public schools of my youth. The students that get crushed or fall through the cracks in this system. It is kind of cruel. And it isn't what you see promoted. What is promoted is only vote pandering. Much is nonsense.
The perpetual victim status of all these divisions which have nothing to do with whether you are worth a damn as a human or not, is now ensured to continue indefinitely as we immerse ourselves in the hatred and contemplation of "privilege". You cannot have the privilege of which we speak without someone being victimized. Almost everyone has the opportunity to be a victim. No need to state the obvious, especially because you get labeled as something you are not if you do. Got to be a universal oppressor somewhere...
And it is true in some ways. What people refuse to do is to stick to the truth in their stories and examples, even when truth is there. That extra bit of exaggeration, the little omission.
See? Smart enough to catch a understand a bit, but not stalwart enough to stick to truth and try to look back several steps to see what was going on up to now; to double check their story.
We don't have much info indicating humans were ever at peace. But I hold that we really don't know. They keep finding older evidence of the species.
But the ones who actually consider themselves "the masses" (ugly term) can actually be convinced that the African continent was in peaceful bliss, that the Aztecs were at one with nature and a big love fest of a nation before europeans hit the shore.
I am not saying I am a fan of Inquisition period Spain or any of that. But that does not justify lying about the rest of the world. That is what made the philosophy espoused in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in our Constitution so important and cutting edge. And yet people still look for kings and queens and lords and masters; "Camelot", my ass.
Sunday, July 2, 2017
Movie Review
I live miles from everywhere. Up here they do not run cable. You can get satellite. So internet connection methods are limited. Anyway, I am among the unwashed who still use Redbox and watch DVDs on my laptop.
Which is why I rented this incredibly odd movie, "Viking Legacy". The stole Seinfeld's "show about nothing" idea. Maybe they took it too far.
The movie is about some scrolls and world peace and sex in the woods, but not really. Wow, I just realized they should quote me there. It makes the movie sound far more coherent and interesting than it is. So many things made no sense. Like why didn't the bad guys just shoot them with arrows through the thin wall of fire? No need to elaborate on that.'
The acting did improve as we went along. People on screen appeared genuinely relieved when their characters got knifed in the heart and what-have-you, welcoming death with unnatural zeal, if you ask me.
There you have it. So bad, and weirdly paced that I am almost tempted to recommend it. Like as a time filler if you're laid up and bored but too doped up to care about plot and such.
Do you think they teach people how to act that badly? I almost want to give kudos because the actors are so good at proving they can't act, but they're chic in a Tiny Tim sort of way.
These are Vikings in the old days. Hanging out somewhere in the land of Christians. Nuns killing people right and left. Seriously, bad ass nun.
I realize a murderous nun is no shock to many of those who grew up Catholic and attended parochial school. She's not a Viking, of course. She's even meaner. They baptized one Norseman, our low key hero.
He switched from his gods to hers (the heroine not nun) because he was in heat and on her turf. That part was true to life.
Really, no offense, but isn't converting to a religion to please a spouse sort of nonsense? You are doing it for one general reason,. And it has nothing to do with suddenly finding God, it's because that's the surest way to round the bases and come sliding in at home.
I'm not saying I wouldn't convert under proper motivation. Even though I really dislike a lot of religions; a bigot and a phobe. I won't argue it one way or another beyond that, just saying yea I'm phobic.
I went off topic. This movie is perfect if you need noise going on while you doze off.
They used the word Viking to attract viewers, I guess. No boats, just some wandering around stabbing and uttering dialog written by someone not privy to the movie's plot.
All the good guys get killed anyway. Conversion did not help that. But the nun and the chick whose character may have been central to this riveting story (not sure) ride off on some mission to "the Council" shouting "girl power" or some equivalent, so it seems. yay
Which is why I rented this incredibly odd movie, "Viking Legacy". The stole Seinfeld's "show about nothing" idea. Maybe they took it too far.
The movie is about some scrolls and world peace and sex in the woods, but not really. Wow, I just realized they should quote me there. It makes the movie sound far more coherent and interesting than it is. So many things made no sense. Like why didn't the bad guys just shoot them with arrows through the thin wall of fire? No need to elaborate on that.'
The acting did improve as we went along. People on screen appeared genuinely relieved when their characters got knifed in the heart and what-have-you, welcoming death with unnatural zeal, if you ask me.
There you have it. So bad, and weirdly paced that I am almost tempted to recommend it. Like as a time filler if you're laid up and bored but too doped up to care about plot and such.
Do you think they teach people how to act that badly? I almost want to give kudos because the actors are so good at proving they can't act, but they're chic in a Tiny Tim sort of way.
These are Vikings in the old days. Hanging out somewhere in the land of Christians. Nuns killing people right and left. Seriously, bad ass nun.
I realize a murderous nun is no shock to many of those who grew up Catholic and attended parochial school. She's not a Viking, of course. She's even meaner. They baptized one Norseman, our low key hero.
He switched from his gods to hers (the heroine not nun) because he was in heat and on her turf. That part was true to life.
Really, no offense, but isn't converting to a religion to please a spouse sort of nonsense? You are doing it for one general reason,. And it has nothing to do with suddenly finding God, it's because that's the surest way to round the bases and come sliding in at home.
I'm not saying I wouldn't convert under proper motivation. Even though I really dislike a lot of religions; a bigot and a phobe. I won't argue it one way or another beyond that, just saying yea I'm phobic.
I went off topic. This movie is perfect if you need noise going on while you doze off.
They used the word Viking to attract viewers, I guess. No boats, just some wandering around stabbing and uttering dialog written by someone not privy to the movie's plot.
All the good guys get killed anyway. Conversion did not help that. But the nun and the chick whose character may have been central to this riveting story (not sure) ride off on some mission to "the Council" shouting "girl power" or some equivalent, so it seems. yay
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- John0 Juanderlust
- Ballistic Mountain, CA, United States
- Like spring on a summer's day
